Criteria and evaluation for ontology modularization techniques

70Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While many authors have argued for the benefits of applying principles of modularization to ontologies, there is not yet a common understanding of how modules are defined and what properties they should have. In the previous section, this question was addressed from a purely logical point of view. In this chapter, we take a broader view on possible criteria that can be used to determine the quality of a modules. Such criteria include logic-based, but also structural and application-dependent criteria, sometimes borrowing from related fields such as software engineering. We give an overview of possible criteria and identify a lack of application-dependent quality measures. We further report some modularization experiments and discuss the role of quality criteria and evaluation in the context of these experiments. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

D’Aquin, M., Schlicht, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., & Sabou, M. (2009). Criteria and evaluation for ontology modularization techniques. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5445 LNCS, pp. 67–89). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free