Arguments that support decisions in e-cognocracy: A quantitative approach based on priorities intensity

8Citations
Citations of this article
158Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper deals with the identification of the arguments that support the decisions made within the context of e-cognocracy. To this end, on the basis of a discussion carried out through communication media, more specifically a forum, we present different decisional tools oriented to the identification of the outstanding comments from the quantitative values corresponding to the decision makers’ preferences. The arguments that support the decisions made by the different actors involved in the resolution process will be obtained from these comments by using text-mining techniques.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moreno-Jiménez, J. M., Escobar, M. T., Toncovich, A., & Turón, A. (2008). Arguments that support decisions in e-cognocracy: A quantitative approach based on priorities intensity. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 19, pp. 649–658). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87783-7_83

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free