Local viscoelastic response of direct and indirect dental restorative composites measured by AFM

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigated the viscoelastic response of direct and indirect dental restorative composites by the novel technique of AM-FM atomic force microscopy. We selected four composites for direct restorations (Adonis, Optifil, EPH, CME) and three composites for indirect restorations (Gradia, Estenia, Signum). Scanning electron microscopy with micro-analysis was also used to support the results. The mean storage modulus of all composites was in the range of 10.2–15.2 GPa. EPH was the stiffest (p<0.05 vs. all other composites but Adonis and Estenia), while no significant difference was observed between direct and indirect group (p≥0.05). For the loss tangent, Gradia had the highest value (~0.3), different (p<0.05) from Optifil (~0.01) and EPH (~0.04) despite the large coefficient of variation (24%), and the direct composites showed higher loss tangent (p<0.01) than the indirect composites. All composites exhibited minor contrast at the edge of fillers, showing that these are pre-polymerized, as confirmed by EDS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grattarola, L., Derchi, G., Diaspro, A., Gambaro, C., & Salerno, M. (2018). Local viscoelastic response of direct and indirect dental restorative composites measured by AFM. Dental Materials Journal, 37(3), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free