European NOx emissions in WRF-Chem derived from OMI: Impacts on summertime surface ozone

46Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ozone (O3) is a secondary air pollutant that negatively affects human and ecosystem health. Ozone simulations with regional air quality models suffer from unexplained biases over Europe, and uncertainties in the emissions of ozone precursor group nitrogen oxides (NOx= NO+NO) contribute to these biases. The goal of this study is to use NO2 column observations from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) satellite sensor to infer top-down NOx emissions in the regional Weather Research and Forecasting model with coupled chemistry (WRF-Chem) and to evaluate the impact on simulated surface O3 with in situ observations. We first perform a simulation for July 2015 over Europe and evaluate its performance against in situ observations from the AirBase network. The spatial distribution of mean ozone concentrations is reproduced satisfactorily. However, the simulated maximum daily 8h ozone concentration (MDA8 O3) is underestimated (mean bias error of -14.2μgm-3), and its spread is too low. We subsequently derive satellite-constrained surface NOx emissions using a mass balance approach based on the relative difference between OMI and WRF-Chem NO2 columns. The method accounts for feedbacks through OH, NO2's dominant daytime oxidant. Our optimized European NOx emissions amount to 0.50TgN (for July 2015), which is 0.18TgN higher than the bottom-up emissions (which lacked agricultural soil NOx emissions). Much of the increases occur across Europe, in regions where agricultural soil NOx emissions dominate. Our best estimate of soil NOx emissions in July 2015 is 0.1TgN, much higher than the bottom-up 0.02TgN natural soil NOx emissions from the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN). A simulation with satellite-updated NOx emissions reduces the systematic bias between WRF-Chem and OMI NO2 (slopeCombining double low line0.98, r2Combining double low line0.84) and reduces the low bias against independent surface NO2 measurements by 1.1μgm-3 (-56%). Following these NOx emission changes, daytime ozone is strongly affected, since NOx emission changes particularly affect daytime ozone formation. Monthly averaged simulated daytime ozone increases by 6.0μgm-3, and increases of >10μgm-3 are seen in regions with large emission increases. With respect to the initial simulation, MDA8 O3 has an improved spatial distribution, expressed by an increase in r2 from 0.40 to 0.53, and a decrease of the mean bias by 7.4μgm-3 (48%). Overall, our results highlight the dependence of surface ozone on its precursor NOx and demonstrate that simulations of surface ozone benefit from constraining surface NOx emissions by satellite NO2 column observations.

References Powered by Scopus

The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system

20579Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale

4399Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature)

3455Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Substantial nitrogen oxides emission reduction from China due to COVID-19 and its impact on surface ozone and aerosol pollution

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updated tropospheric chemistry reanalysis and emission estimates, TCR-2, for 2005-2018

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

High spatial resolution WRF-Chem model over Asia: Physics and chemistry evaluation

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Visser, A. J., Folkert Boersma, K., Ganzeveld, L. N., & Krol, M. C. (2019). European NOx emissions in WRF-Chem derived from OMI: Impacts on summertime surface ozone. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 19(18), 11821–11841. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11821-2019

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

50%

Researcher 20

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 15

48%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 11

35%

Chemistry 3

10%

Physics and Astronomy 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free