Formative-reflective scheme for the assessment of tourism destination competitiveness: an analysis of Italian municipalities

9Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, we propose a formative-reflective scheme for the assessment of Tourism Destination Competitiveness (TDC) based on a combined use of Partial Least Squares-Path Modelling (PLS-PM) and the method recently proposed by Fattore, Pelagatti, and Vittadini (FPV). TDC is conceived as a construct reflecting the tourism performance of a destination, and several determinants are considered, including endowed resources, created resources, and supporting factors. The proposed scheme is applied to a case study on 1575 Italian municipalities for which the Italian National Institute of Statistics released data on tourist flows. Our contribution is innovative for three aspects: (i) the consistency of the formative-reflective scheme for TDC assessment is discussed on a theoretical basis; (ii) an empirical comparison between PLS-PM and the FPV method is performed; (iii) data with higher granularity than most studies on TDC assessment are employed. Our findings highlight that endowed resources are the primary driver of TDC, followed by created resources and supporting factors, and emphasize that the best ranked destinations are big cities with a multifaceted tourism alongside sea and mountain destinations with cultural attractions.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Online posting intention: do the social communication and brand equity of esports matter?

7Citations
79Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grassini, L., Magrini, A., & Conti, E. (2023). Formative-reflective scheme for the assessment of tourism destination competitiveness: an analysis of Italian municipalities. Quality and Quantity, 57(4), 3523–3548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01519-1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 4

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 3

43%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free