Paving the way for mature secondary research: the seven types of literature review

22Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Confusion over different kinds of secondary research, and their divergent purposes, is undermining the effectiveness and usefulness of secondary studies in software engineering. This short paper therefore explains the differences between ad hoc review, case survey, critical review, meta-analysis (aka systematic literature review), meta-synthesis (aka thematic analysis), rapid review and scoping review (aka systematic mapping study). These definitions and associated guidelines help researchers better select and describe their literature reviews, while helping reviewers select more appropriate evaluation criteria.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ralph, P., & Baltes, S. (2022). Paving the way for mature secondary research: the seven types of literature review. In ESEC/FSE 2022 - Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint Meeting European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (pp. 1632–1636). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3540250.3560877

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free