Grounding in Electronic Discussions: Standard (Threaded) Versus Anchored Discussion

  • van der Pol J
  • Admiraal W
  • Simons R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper identifies 'grounding' as an important process in asynchronous electronic meaning oriented discussions and tries to enhance and measure grounding activities, mutual understanding and the relevancy of messages. In this study, 190 first year students collaborated electronically with the goal of processing their literature together. Using a posttest only experimental design students were divided into a group that used a standard discussion board and one that used an annotation or 'anchored discussion' system. The used research instruments were: dialogue analysis, questionnaires and focus group interviews. Results will be analyzed and discussed in the light of the difference between the 2 conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, R.-J. (2003). Grounding in Electronic Discussions: Standard (Threaded) Versus Anchored Discussion. In Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments (pp. 77–81). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free