The mass-independence of specific star formation rates in galactic disks

109Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The slope of the star formation rate/stellar mass relation (the SFR "Main Sequence"; SFR-M *) is not quite unity: specific star formation rates (SFR/M *) are weakly but significantly anti-correlated with M *. Here we demonstrate that this trend may simply reflect the well-known increase in bulge mass-fractions - portions of a galaxy not forming stars - with M *. Using a large set of bulge/disk decompositions and SFR estimates derived from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, we show that re-normalizing SFR by disk stellar mass (sSFR disk ≡ SFR/M *, disk) reduces the M * dependence of SF efficiency by 0.25 dex per dex, erasing it entirely in some subsamples. Quantitatively, we find log sSFR disk-log M * to have a slope β disk ∈ [-0.20, 0.00] ± 0.02 (depending on the SFR estimator and Main Sequence definition) for star-forming galaxies with M * ≥ 1010 M ⊙ and bulge mass-fractions B/T ≲ 0.6, generally consistent with a pure-disk control sample (β control = -0.05 ± 0.04). That 〈SFR/M *, disk〉 is (largely) independent of host mass for star-forming disks has strong implications for aspects of galaxy evolution inferred from any SFR-M * relation, including manifestations of "mass quenching" (bulge growth), factors shaping the star-forming stellar mass function (uniform dlog M */dt for low-mass, disk-dominated galaxies), and diversity in star formation histories (dispersion in SFR(M *, t)). Our results emphasize the need to treat galaxies as composite systems - not integrated masses - in observational and theoretical work. © 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved..

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abramson, L. E., Kelson, D. D., Dressler, A., Poggianti, B., Gladders, M. D., Oemler, A., & Vulcani, B. (2014). The mass-independence of specific star formation rates in galactic disks. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 785(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/785/2/L36

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free