Effectiveness of supplemental oxygenation to prevent surgical site infections: A systematic review with meta-analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: to assess the effectiveness of supplemental oxygenation with high FiO2 when compared to conventional FiO2 in the prevention of surgical site infection. Method: an effectiveness systematic review with meta-analysis conducted in five international databases and portals. The research was guided by the following question: Which is the effectiveness of supplemental oxygenation with high FiO2 (greater than 80%) when compared to conventional FiO2 (from 30% to 35%) in the prevention of surgical site infections in adults? Results: fifteen randomized clinical trials were included. Although all the subgroups presented a general effect in favor of the intervention, colorectal surgeries had this relationship evidenced with statistical significance (I²=10%; X²=4.42; p=0.352). Conclusion: inspired oxygen fractions greater than 80% during the perioperative period in colorectal surgeries have proved to be effective to prevent surgical site infections, reducing their incidence by up to 27% (p=0.006). It is suggested to conduct new studies in groups of patients subjected to surgeries from other specialties, such as cardiac and vascular. PROSPERO registration No.: 178,453.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gomes, E. T., Carbogim, F. da C., Lins, R. S., Lins-Filho, R. L. de M., Poveda, V. de B., & Püschel, V. A. de A. (2022). Effectiveness of supplemental oxygenation to prevent surgical site infections: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. Escola de Enfermagem de Universidade de Sao Paulo. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6106.3648

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free