Comparative microbial sampling from eutrophic caves in Slovenia and Slovakia using RIDA ®COUNT test kits

35Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

RIDA®COUNT test plates were used as an easy-to-handle and rapid indicator of microbial counts in karst ecosystems of several caves in Slovakia and Slovenia. All of the caves had a high organic input from water streams, tourists, roosting bat colonies or terrestrial surroundings. We sampled swabs, water and air samples to test robustness and universality of the RIDA®COUNT test kit (R-Biopharm AG, Germany, http://www.r-biopharm.com/) for quantification of total bacteria, coliforms, yeast and mold. Using data from swabs (colony-forming units CFU per cm 2) we proposed a scale for description of biocontamination level or superficial microbial load of cave niches. Based on this scale, surfaces of Ardovská Cave, Drienovská Cave and Stará Brzotínská Cave (Slovakia) were moderately colonized by microbes, with total microbial counts (sum of total bacterial count and total yeast and molds count) in the range of 1,001-10,000 CFU/100 cm 2, while some surfaces from the show cave Postojna Cave (Slovenia) can be considered hihly colonized by microbes (total microbial counts ≥ 10,001 CFU/100 cm 2). Ardovská Cave also had a high concentration of airborne microbes, which can be explained by restricted air circulation and regular bat activity. The ratio of coliform to total counts of bacteria in the 9 km of underground Pivka River flow in Postojna Cave dropped approximately 4-fold from the entrance, indicating the high anthropogenic pollution in the most exposed site in the show cave. The RIDA®COUNT test kit was proven to be applicable for regular monitoring of eutrophication and human influence in eutrophic karst caves.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mulec, J., Krištůfek, V., & Chroňáková, A. (2012). Comparative microbial sampling from eutrophic caves in Slovenia and Slovakia using RIDA ®COUNT test kits. International Journal of Speleology, 41(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5038/1827-806X.41.1.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free