Social objects exist, the proof being the difference between thinking to promise something, and actually promising something: once you give your word, the promise keeps on existing, even in case you forget about it, or—as more frequently happens—you change your mind. The first aim of this article is to expand on the nature of social objects, as contrasted with physical and ideal objects, and to spell out the steps that lead to their discovery. Secondly, I will illustrate and criticize the major contemporary theory on social objects, John Searle’s theory, and compare it with another theory, according to which social objects are a kind of inscription. Lastly, I want show how, from this standpoint, a social ontology evolves naturally into a theory of documents, which I propose to name “documentality”.
CITATION STYLE
Ferraris, M. (2011). Social Ontology and Documentality. In Law, Governance and Technology Series (Vol. 1, pp. 83–97). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0120-5_5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.