A concise and practical framework for the development and usability evaluation of patient information websites

14Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Website Developmental Model for the Healthcare Consumer (WDMHC) is an extensive and successfully evaluated framework that incorporates user-centered design principles. However, due to its extensiveness its application is limited. In the current study we apply a subset of the WDMHC framework in a case study concerning the development and evaluation of a website aimed at childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Objective: To assess whether the implementation of a limited subset of the WDMHC-framework is sufficient to deliver a high-quality website with few usability problems, aimed at a specific patient population. Methods: The website was developed using a six-step approach divided into three phases derived from the WDMHC: 1) information needs analysis, mock-up creation and focus group discussion; 2) website prototype development; and 3) heuristic evaluation (HE) and think aloud analysis (TA). The HE was performed by three double experts (knowledgeable both in usability engineering and childhood cancer survivorship), who assessed the site using the Nielsen heuristics. Eight end-users were invited to complete three scenarios covering all functionality of the website by TA. Results: The HE and TA were performed concurrently on the website prototype. The HE resulted in 29 unique usability issues; the end-users performing the TA encountered eleven unique problems. Four issues specifically revealed by HE concerned cosmetic design flaws, whereas two problems revealed by TA were related to website content. Conclusion: Based on the subset of the WDMHC framework we were able to deliver a website that closely matched the expectancy of the end-users and resulted in relatively few usability problems during end-user testing. With the successful application of this subset of the WDMHC, we provide developers with a clear and easily applicable framework for the development of healthcare websites with high usability aimed at specific medical populations.

References Powered by Scopus

Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces

2210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Medical assessment of adverse health outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood cancer

712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test

348Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Participatory methods to engage health service users in the development of electronic health resources: systematic review

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing Infographics to Facilitate HIV-Related Patient-Provider Communication in a Limited-Resource Setting

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of a Breastfeeding App in Rural Australia: Prospective Cohort Study

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peute, L. W., Knijnenburg, S. L., Kremer, L. C., & Jaspers, M. W. M. (2015). A concise and practical framework for the development and usability evaluation of patient information websites. Applied Clinical Informatics, 6(2), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2014-11-RA-0109

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 29

51%

Researcher 18

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

41%

Computer Science 10

23%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

20%

Psychology 7

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free