Performance of geothermal power plants (single, dual, and binary) to compensate for LHC-CERN power consumption: comparative study

84Citations
Citations of this article
253Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare between single flash, dual flash, and binary power plants in terms of the power generated, their performance, and the related cost. The results from the comparison are used to find the best plant type that can be implemented to compensate for the very high power requirements of a large hadron collider (LHC). Using the setting and requirements of the CERN LHC in Geneva, Switzerland, the study uses System Advisor Model software to analyze the implementation of the different plant types. Results show that the binary power plant has the best performance and lowest cost compared with other geothermal power plants analyzed, and there is a reduction in the total power generation cost when using renewable energy sources.

References Powered by Scopus

Energy production from biomass (part 1): Overview of biomass

3926Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle

1214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biofuels: A technological perspective

550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Recent progress in the use of renewable energy sources to power water desalination plants

540Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications, challenges and suggestions

414Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applications of geothermal organic Rankine Cycle for electricity production

174Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El Haj Assad, M., Bani-Hani, E., & Khalil, M. (2017). Performance of geothermal power plants (single, dual, and binary) to compensate for LHC-CERN power consumption: comparative study. Geothermal Energy, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40517-017-0074-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 51

70%

Researcher 12

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 48

54%

Energy 22

25%

Chemical Engineering 11

12%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 8

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free