Critical Analysis of a Hypothesis of the Planetary Tidal Influence on Solar Activity

25Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present work is a critical revision of the hypothesis of the planetary tidal influence on solar activity published by Abreu et al. (Astron. Astrophys. 548, A88, 2012; called A12 here). A12 describes the hypothesis that planets can have an impact on the solar tachocline and therefore on solar activity. We checked the procedure and results of A12, namely the algorithm of planetary tidal torque calculation and the wavelet coherence between torque and heliospheric modulation potential. We found that the claimed peaks in long-period range of the torque spectrum are artefacts caused by the calculation algorithm (viz. aliasing effect). Also the statistical significance of the results of the wavelet coherence is found to be overestimated by an incorrect choice of the background assumption of red noise. Using a more conservative non-parametric random-phase method, we found that the long-period coherence between planetary torque and heliospheric modulation potential becomes insignificant. Thus we conclude that the considered hypothesis of planetary tidal influence on solar activity is not based on a solid ground. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poluianov, S., & Usoskin, I. (2014). Critical Analysis of a Hypothesis of the Planetary Tidal Influence on Solar Activity. Solar Physics, 289(6), 2333–2342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0475-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free