Basic pretending as sensorimotor engagement?: Lessons from sensorimotor theory for the debate on pretence

21Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper explores whether the sensorimotor theory of perception (SMTP) might contribute to a de-intellectualized understanding of pretence. It applies SMTP to Currie’s [3], [4] notion of perceptual seeing-in that underlies the capacity to make imaginative transformations (seeing-as). This account bypasses manipulation of representational contents off-line, and argues that the relevant work might done by on-line, sensory imaginings stemming directly from perception. This novel position is supported with augmented theory of affordances and an account of directly perceived meaning. Ultimately, the paper proposes a less intellectualist approach than Currie’s to object-substitution pretend play of young children, setting the stage for an enactive theory of basic pretence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rucinska, Z. (2014). Basic pretending as sensorimotor engagement?: Lessons from sensorimotor theory for the debate on pretence. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 15, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05107-9_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free