Postoperative Kinetics of C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sediment Rate in One-, Two-, and Multilevel Posterior Spinal Decompressions and Instrumentations

9Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study design: Prospective study. Objective: To characterize the normal pattern of kinetics of postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) after decompression, spinal instrumentation, and posterolateral fusion in 1, 2, and more than 2 levels. Methods: Blood specimens were obtained from patients who underwent posterior decompression, instrumentation with pedicular screws, and posterolateral fusion from June 2009 to January 2011. CRP and ESR levels were measured on the day before surgery and on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, 11, 14, 28, and 42. Results: Mean CRP levels peaked on the third day postoperatively in all groups. By day 7 postoperatively, it had dropped rapidly. At the 14th and 28th postoperative days, decreases to normal CRP levels were found in 16% and 80% of all patients, respectively. The pattern of decline in CRP was similar among groups. Values of ESR increased and peaked between the third and seventh postoperative days. ESR values gradually decreased. At the 42 day postoperatively, ESR level still remain above normal values in all groups. Conclusions: We compared conventional operation groups of 1-, 2-, and more than 2-level posterior instrumentation and found no statistically significant differences in the peak of CRP level, the ESR value, and the pattern of decline. CRP levels of 80% of the patients returned to normal within 4 weeks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kunakornsawat, S., Tungsiripat, R., Putthiwara, D., Piyakulkaew, C., Pluemvitayaporn, T., Pruttikul, P., & Kittithamvongs, P. (2017). Postoperative Kinetics of C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sediment Rate in One-, Two-, and Multilevel Posterior Spinal Decompressions and Instrumentations. Global Spine Journal, 7(5), 448–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217699389

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free