Collingwood, Pragmatism, and Philosophy of Science

Abstract

This paper argues that there are notable similarities between Collingwood's method of investigating absolute presuppositions and contemporary strands of pragmatism, focusing on two areas-the critique of realism and causation. It is first argued that there are methodological similarities between Collingwood's argument against realism and his Kantian-inspired critique of metaphysics, and Putnam's critique of externalism. Regarding causation, it is argued that Collingwood's view and Price's pragmatist approach have a common method-investigating causation in the context of specific human practices. Both authors place causation in the framework of scientific inquiry as opposed to making it the subject of the inquiry itself. Thus, Collingwood's work proves to be in line with current metaphilosophical debates, particularly in the philosophy of science.