Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I to Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction

47Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background This study examined the performance of single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) measurement strategies to rule out acute myocardial infarction. Methods This was a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department (n = 1631) in whom cTnI measurements were obtained using an investigational hs-cTnI assay. The goals of the study were to determine 1) negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, type 1 myocardial infarction, and type 2 myocardial infarction; and 2) safety outcome of acute myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days using hs-cTnI less than the limit of detection (LoD) (<1.9 ng/L) or the High-STEACS threshold (<5 ng/L) alone and in combination with normal electrocardiogram (ECG). Results Acute myocardial infarction occurred in 170 patients (10.4%), including 68 (4.2%) type 1 myocardial infarction and 102 (6.3%) type 2 myocardial infarction. For hs-cTnI <5 ng/L (50%), the NPV and sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction were 98.9% (98.2%-99.6%) and 94.7% (91.3%-98.1%). In combination with a normal ECG, 1) hs-cTnI <5 ng/L had an NPV of 99.5% (98.8%-100%) and sensitivity of 98.8% (97.2%-100%). The NPV and sensitivity for the safety outcome were excellent for hs-cTnI <5 ng/L in combination with a normal ECG. Conclusion Strategies using a single hs-cTnI alone or in combination with a normal ECG allow the immediate identification of patients unlikely to have acute myocardial infarction and who are at very low risk for adverse events at 30 days.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sandoval, Y., Smith, S. W., Love, S. A., Sexter, A., Schulz, K., & Apple, F. S. (2017). Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I to Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction. American Journal of Medicine, 130(9), 1076-1083.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free