High performance older adults in a population-based sample with low education: Pietà study

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Healthy brain aging can be defined as aging without neurological or psychiatric disorders, sustaining functional independence. In addition to the absence of disease and preserved functionality, there are individuals who stand out for their superior performance to that considered normal for their age in cognitive tests. These individuals are called “high-performance older adults” (HPOA). Objectives To investigate the presence of HPOA in an oldest-old population with low education, and if present, to investigate associations with sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle variables. Methods We evaluated 132 cognitively healthy individuals from the Pietà Study, a population-based investigation with 639 participants. We used the delayed recall from the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test to verify the existence of HPOA and to classify participants based on their performance. Sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle variables associated with HPOA were investigated. Results We identified 18 individuals fulfilling HPOA criteria (age: 77.4 + 2.6 years old; 14 women; education: 4.6 + 3.4 years). The other participants, 114 total (age: 79.8 + 4.5 years old; 69 women; education: 3.0 + 2.7 years) were classified as “standard performance older adults” (SPOA). In multivariate analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR] ¼ 0.672; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.462-0.979; p ¼ 0.037) and lower scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale (OR ¼ 0.831; 95%CI: 0.688-0.989; p ¼ 0.038) were associated with HPOA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carmona, K. C., de Paula França Resende, E., Guimarães, H. C., Machado, T. H., Amaral-Carvalho, V., dos Santos, E. L., … Caramelli, P. (2023). High performance older adults in a population-based sample with low education: Pietà study. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 81(2), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free