Where Should We Discuss the Soul? On the Relation between the Doctrines of De anima and De generatione et corruptione

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

De Boer’s chapter addresses the main methodological issue raised by Buridan’s questions on Aristotle’s first book: the place of the De anima in the commentary tradition on Aristotle’s natural philosophy. The chapter argues that the fourteenth-century tendency to raise issues concerning the relationship of the mixture of the Aristotelian elements and the substantial form (or substantial forms) of the resulting mixed body in the context of discussions of nature of the soul culminated in Buridan’s unified natural philosophy in which the themes from De generatione and De anima supplement and reinforce each other.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Boer, S. W. (2017). Where Should We Discuss the Soul? On the Relation between the Doctrines of De anima and De generatione et corruptione. In Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action (Vol. 3, pp. 21–43). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51763-6_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free