Exercise Mataika: White Paper on response to a smallpox bioterrorism release in the Pacific

12Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980, with known seed stock retained in two high security Biosafety Level 4 laboratories in the United States and Russia. Experts agree the likelihood of theft from these laboratories is low, and that synthetic creation of smallpox is a theoretical possibility. Until 2017 it was believed that synthetic smallpox was technically too complex a task to be a serious threat. However, in 2017, Canadian scientists synthesised a closely related orthopoxvirus, horsepox, using mail order DNA and $100,000. Simultaneously, terrorist groups have declared intent to conduct biological attacks. In this context an exercise was held on August 16th 2018, with international and cross-sectoral stakeholders to review preparedness for a bioterrorism attack in the Asia-Pacific region and globally. The exercise was conducted by The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence, Integrated Systems for Epidemic Response, with contextual input from the Ministry of Health and Medical Services Fiji. The scenario involved a deliberate release in Fiji, followed by a larger release in a more populous Asian country. Mathematical modelling was used to underpin epidemic projections under different conditions. The exercise alternated between clinical, public health, emergency and societal responses, with participants making real-time decisions on cross-sectoral response across the region and the world. Key weak points which are influential in determining the final size and impact of the epidemic were identified (based on mathematical modelling of transmission in Fiji and globally). We identified potential gaps in preparedness for smallpox and factors which influence the severity of a smallpox epidemic. This included identifying which determinants of epidemic size are potentially within our control, and which are not. Influential factors within our control include: preventing an attack through intelligence, law enforcement and legislation; speed of diagnosis; speed and completeness of case finding and case isolation; speed and security of vaccination response, including stockpiling; speed and completeness of contact tracing; protecting critical infrastructure and business continuity; non-pharmaceutical interventions (social distancing, PPE, border control); protecting first responders; operational support and logistics; social mobilisation and risk communication. Based on discussion at the workshop between diverse stakeholders, recommendations were made to guide improved prevention, mitigation and rapid response, thus providing a holistic, cross-sectoral framework for prevention of a worst-case scenario smallpox pandemic.

References Powered by Scopus

Projecting social contact matrices in 152 countries using contact surveys and demographic data

525Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: A systematic review of the literature

404Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emerging infectious diseases in southeast Asia: Regional challenges to control

365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On a knife’s edge of a COVID-19 pandemic: Is containment still possible?

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health system capacity in Sydney, Australia in the event of a biological attack with smallpox

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Countering the potential re-emergence of a deadly infectious disease-Information warfare, identifying strategic threats, launching countermeasures

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Macintyre, C. R., Heslop, D. J., Nand, D., Schramm, C., Butel, M., Rawlinson, W., … Lane, J. M. (2019). Exercise Mataika: White Paper on response to a smallpox bioterrorism release in the Pacific. Global Biosecurity, 1. https://doi.org/10.31646/gbio.10

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Researcher 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Immunology and Microbiology 3

38%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

25%

Arts and Humanities 2

25%

Chemistry 1

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0