Dry holes in economic research

62Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Between 1974 and 1996, there was substantial increase in the emphasis on academic research in universities located in the United States and elsewhere throughout the world. The increased emphasis was, and continues to be, reflected in a variety of increased incentives for faculty to produce research, including higher salaries, reduced teaching loads, increased money for travel, on so on. Yet, as we report in this paper, during this time period the rate of uncitedness of economics papers remained constant (at 26 percent). Clearly, universities and taxpayers/supporters of universities are obtaining no enhancement of research output (in terms of citations) from the increased subsidy to faculty research. We discuss the implications of this result for the publication and organization of economic research. In particular, we discuss the fact that resources devoted to up-front screening of papers by authors and journals have risen substantially over this period, but to no avail with respect to reducing the incidence of dry holes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laband, D. N., & Tollison, R. D. (2003). Dry holes in economic research. Kyklos, 56(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00215

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free