Applications, Complications, and Outcomes of Transvenous Pacemaker Implantation in 105 Dogs (1997–2002)

  • Wess G
  • Thomas W
  • Berger D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We reviewed the indications for age and breeds of dogs who received transvenous endocardial artificial pacemaker (AP) implantation (n = 105) and complications and survival thereafter at a single institution over a 6‐year period. A third‐degree atrioventricular (AV) block (59%) and sick sinus syndrome (SSS; 27%) were the most common indications, along with a high‐grade second‐degree AV block (9%) and atrial standstill (5%). The most common breeds identified were Labrador Retriever (n = 16; 11 with a third‐degree AV block), American Cocker Spaniel (n = 14; 10 with SSS), and Miniature Schnauzer (n = 13; all with SSS). Common presenting complaints were syncope (n = 66) and exercise intolerance or lethargy (n = 25). Half of the dogs (n = 52) had a history of acute onset of clinical signs (< 2 weeks). Mean survival time for the 60 dogs who died during the study period was 2.2 years (range, 0.1–5.8 years). Major complications occurred in 13% of dogs and included lead displacement (n = 7), sensing problems that led to syncope (n = 3), infection at the pacemaker site (n = 1), bleeding (n = 1), and ventricular fibrillation during implantation (n = 1; successfully defibrillated). Minor complications occurred in 11 dogs (11%). The success rate of transvenous AP implantation was comparatively high (all dogs survived the first 48 hours), and the complication rate was comparatively low when compared with a previous multicenter study, most likely because of how commonly the procedure was performed and supervisory experience.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wess, G., Thomas, W. P., Berger, D. M., & Kittleson, M. D. (2006). Applications, Complications, and Outcomes of Transvenous Pacemaker Implantation in 105 Dogs (1997–2002). Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 20(4), 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2006.tb01801.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free