The Ethical Content of the Economic Analysis of Disasters: Price Gouging and Post-Disaster Recovery

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Economics, generally, is a discipline in which relatively little attention is devoted to language and terminology. As such, economists have not really attempted to define the concept of disasters very carefully, nor have they evaluated the ethics that are behind the economic analysis of disasters. Given this absence, we believe that a better understanding of the ways in which the discipline approaches the topic of disasters and its ethics is gained not by examining the multitude of definitions in the discipline, but by examining specific examples of topics that are contested within the economic literature on disasters and their ethical content. Outlining the main arguments and methodological approaches that economists use to think about these topics will, we hope, better clarify the general approach that economists use when embarking on disciplinary research on the topic of disasters. As such, we choose to focus on two topics: price gouging, and post-disaster economic recovery. The first is a topic that is explicitly ethically challenging from an economic perspective; the second involves many implicit ethical decisions that are almost never made explicit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noy, I. (2018). The Ethical Content of the Economic Analysis of Disasters: Price Gouging and Post-Disaster Recovery. In Advancing Global Bioethics (Vol. 11, pp. 55–68). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92722-0_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free