Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model?

16Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In order to decide which is the best growth model for the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818, we utilized 249 and 256 length-at-age ring readings in otholiths and scales respectively, for the same sample of individuals. The Schnute model was utilized and it is concluded that the Von Bertalanffy model is the most adequate for these data, because it proved highly stable for the data set, and only slightly sensitive to the initial values of the estimated parameters. The phi values estimated from five different data sources presented a CV = 4.78%. The numerical discrepancies between these values are of not much concern due to the high negative correlation between k and Linfinity viz, so that when one of them increases, the other decreases and the final result in phi remains nearly unchanged.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Penna, M. A., Villacorta-Corrêa, M. A., Walter, T., & Petrere-Jr, M. (2005). Growth of the tambaqui Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier) (Characiformes: Characidae): which is the best model? Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasleira de Biologia, 65(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842005000100017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free