Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 after Core Clerkships: An Outcomes Analysis

32Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose Schools undergoing curricular reform are reconsidering the optimal timing of Step 1. This study provides a psychometric investigation of the impact on United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores of changing the timing of Step 1 from after completion of the basic science curricula to after core clerkships. Method Data from four schools that recently moved the examination were analyzed in a pre-post format using examinee scores from three years before and after the change. The sample included scores from 2008 through 2016. Several confounders were addressed, including rising national scores and potential differences in cohort abilities using deviation scores and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores. A resampling procedure compared study schools' score changes versus similar schools' in the same time period. Results The ANCOVA indicated postchange Step 1 scores were higher compared with prechange (adjusted difference = 2.67; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-3.83, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jurich, D., Daniel, M., Paniagua, M., Fleming, A., Harnik, V., Pock, A., … Santen, S. A. (2019). Moving the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 after Core Clerkships: An Outcomes Analysis. Academic Medicine, 94(3), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002458

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free