Prevalence of respiratory symptoms and disorders among rice mill workers in India

33Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Lung function tests have become an integral part of assessment of pulmonary disease. Diseases of the respiratory system induced by occupational dusts are influenced by the duration of exposure. The aim of the study is to investigate the impairment of lung function and prevalence of respiratory symptoms among the rice mill workers. Methods: A total of 120 rice mill workers from three districts of Karnataka were included in this study. Fifty urban dwellers from the same socio-economic level were selected as controls. The study included clinical examination, assessment of respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function test, measurement of peak expiratory flow rate, absolute eosinophil count, ESR estimation, total IgE estimation and radiographic test. Results: The present study has shown that the rice mill workers complained of several types of respiratory disorders like phlegm (40.8%), dyspnea (44.2%), chest tightness (26.7%), cough (21.7%), and nose irritation (27.5%). Rice mill workers exposed to dust presented significantly (p < 0.05) lower levels of FVC (3.44 ± 0.11), FEV1 (2.73 ± 0.15) and PEFR (304.95 ± 28.79) than the controls. The rice mill workers are having significantly higher absolute eosinophil counts, total IgE and ESR than control groups. The hematological findings suggest that the harmful effects may be linked to both non-specific irritation and allergic responses to rice husk dust among rice mill workers. Conclusion: Dust exposure in the working environment affects the lung function values and increased the respiratory symptoms among the rice mill workers. © The Japanese Society for Hygiene 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghosh, T., Gangopadhyay, S., & Das, B. (2014). Prevalence of respiratory symptoms and disorders among rice mill workers in India. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 19(3), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-014-0384-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free