A snowball earth versus a slushball earth: Results from neoproterozoic climate modeling sensitivity experiments

40Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Neoproterozoic was characterized by an extreme glaciation, but until now there has been no consensus as to whether it was a complete glaciation (snowball Earth) or a less severe glaciation (slushball Earth). We performed sensitivity experiments with an Earth model of intermediate complexity for this period of dramatic global cooling. Our simulations focus on the climate response on a cool versus a cold ocean, on a desert versus a glacier land surface, and on a lower versus a higher CO2 concentration. All Neoproterozoic model experiments represent much colder conditions than today and widespread glaciation. In case of an initial forcing representing a snowball Earth, the model maintains its complete glaciation, and temperatures are as low as ∼45 °C in equatorial latitudes. At the poles, the snowball experiments demonstrate annual average temperatures of

References Powered by Scopus

A geologic time scale 2004

2540Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A neoproterozoic snowball earth

2343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pacific margins of Laurentia and East Antarctica-Australia as a conjugate rift pair: evidence and implications for an Eocambrian supercontinent

937Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tourism and climate change: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation

393Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate of the neoproterozoic

259Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sedimentary challenge to snowball earth

199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Micheels, A., & Montenari, M. (2008). A snowball earth versus a slushball earth: Results from neoproterozoic climate modeling sensitivity experiments. Geosphere, 4(2), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00098.1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

58%

Researcher 11

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 46

78%

Environmental Science 6

10%

Physics and Astronomy 5

8%

Engineering 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free