Why is fish “feeling” pain controversial?

  • Stevens E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In his excellent target article, Key (2016) develops a mechanistic argument in an attempt to show why it is unlikely that fish can " feel " pain or for that matter, " feel " anything. The topic is controversial and likely to achieve the goal of getting many hits for the inaugural issue of the new journal, Animal Sentience. In my view, the question is unlikely to be answered, for two reasons. First, because the proponents of the " fish feel pain " controversy are untrained and unskilled in the details and jargon of neurophysiology and/or neuroanatomy, and the opponents of the controversy, like Key, are untrained and unskilled in the details and jargon regarding the philosophy of consciousness. Second, the neural substrate of consciousness in any animal, including humans, has not been clearly delineated with absolute certainty.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevens, E. D. (2016). Why is fish “feeling” pain controversial? Animal Sentience, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.51291/2377-7478.1055

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

77%

Researcher 2

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

70%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

10%

Social Sciences 1

10%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free