Citrate Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: Success and Limits

  • Mariano F
  • Bergamo D
  • Gangemi E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Citrate anticoagulation has risen in interest so it is now a real alternative to heparin in the ICUs practice. Citrate provides a regional anticoagulation virtually restricted to extracorporeal circuit, where it acts by chelating ionized calcium. This issue is particularly true in patients ongoing CRRT, when the “continuous” systemic anticoagulation treatment is per se a relevant risk of bleeding. When compared with heparin most of studies with citrate reported a longer circuit survival, a lower rate of bleeding complications, and transfused packed red cell requirements. As anticoagulant for CRRT, the infusion of citrate is prolonged and it could potentially have some adverse effects. When citrate is metabolized to bicarbonate, metabolic alkalosis may occur, or for impaired metabolism citrate accumulation leads to acidosis. However, large studies with dedicated machines have indeed demonstrated that citrate anticoagulation is well tolerated, safe, and an easy to handle even in septic shock critically ill patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mariano, F., Bergamo, D., Gangemi, E. N., Hollo’, Z., Stella, M., & Triolo, G. (2011). Citrate Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: Success and Limits. International Journal of Nephrology, 2011, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/748320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free