A one-size-fits-all indexing method does not exist: Automatic selection based on meta-learning

27Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a methodology that automatically selects indexing algorithms for each heading in Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), National Library of Medicine's vocabulary for indexing MEDLINE. While manually comparing indexing methods is manageable with a limited number of MeSH headings, a large number of them make automation of this selection desirable. Results show that this process can be automated, based on previously indexed MEDLINE citations. We find that AdaBoostM1 is better suited to index a group of MeSH hedings named Check Tags, and helps improve the micro F-measure from 0.5385 to 0.7157, and the macro F-measure from 0.4123 to 0.5387 (both p < 0.01). © 2012. The Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jimeno-Yepes, A., Mork, J. G., Demner-Fushman, D., & Aronson, A. R. (2012). A one-size-fits-all indexing method does not exist: Automatic selection based on meta-learning. Journal of Computing Science and Engineering, 6(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.5626/JCSE.2012.6.2.151

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free