A Bayesian approach for noisy matrix completion: Optimal rate under general sampling distribution

31Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bayesian methods for low-rank matrix completion with noise have been shown to be very efficient computationally [3, 18, 19, 24, 28]. While the behaviour of penalized minimization methods is well understood both from the theoretical and computational points of view (see [7, 9, 16, 23] among others) in this problem, the theoretical optimality of Bayesian estimators have not been explored yet. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian estimator for matrix completion under general sampling distribution. We also provide an oracle inequality for this estimator. This inequality proves that, whatever the rank of the matrix to be estimated, our estimator reaches the minimax-optimal rate of convergence (up to a logarithmic factor). We end the paper with a short simulation study.

References Powered by Scopus

Exact matrix completion via convex optimization

4009Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The power of convex relaxation: Near-optimal matrix completion

1628Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Matrix completion with noise

1332Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Concentration of tempered posteriors and of their variational approximations

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimation bounds and sharp oracle inequalities of regularized procedures with lipschitz loss functions

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

User-friendly Introduction to PAC-Bayes Bounds

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mai, T. T., & Alquier, P. (2015). A Bayesian approach for noisy matrix completion: Optimal rate under general sampling distribution. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 9, 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1214/15-EJS1020

Readers over time

‘14‘16‘17‘19‘2001234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 7

70%

Engineering 2

20%

Computer Science 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0