In this chapter, I examine a variety of criteria for context individuation, with an eye towards identifying and distinguishing various theoretical projects in semantics and pragmatics for which they would be appropriate. The discussion is organized around six possible desiderata for contexts: (1) that they metaphysically determine proposition expressed, (2) that they be non-trivial (in a sense explained in the text), (3) that they provide epistemic illumination of how hearers understand what proposition was expressed, (4) that they be (in various senses) finite, (5) that they be non-intentionally characterized, and (6) that they be context-insensitively characterized. Particular attention is directed to the conceptions of context developed by Lewis, Stalnaker, and Davidson(ians).
CITATION STYLE
Gross, S. (2013). What is a context? In Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 113–132). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01011-3_5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.