Spatial autocorrelation: A statistician’s reflections

7Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Improvements in both technology and statistical understanding have led to considerable advances in spatial model building over the past 40 years, yet major challenges remain both in model specification and in ensuring that the underlying statistical assumptions are validated. The basic concept in such modeling efforts is that of spatial dependence, often made operational by some measure of spatial autocorrelation. Such measures depend upon the specification or estimation of a set of weights that describe spatial relationships. We examine how the identification of weights has evolved and briefly describe recent developments. After a brief examination of some of the key assumptions commonly made in spatial modeling, we consider the selection of tests of spatial dependence and their application to irregular sub-regions. We then move on to a consideration of local tests and estimation procedures and identify ways in which local procedures may be useful, particularly for large data sets. We conclude with a brief review of a recently developed method for modeling anisotropic spatial processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keith Ord, J. (2010). Spatial autocorrelation: A statistician’s reflections. In Advances in Spatial Science (Vol. 61, pp. 165–180). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free