The subcutaneous ICD: A review of the UNTOUCHED and PRAETORIAN trials

14Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ICD is an important part of the treatment and prevention of sudden cardiac death in many high-risk populations. Traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs) are associated with certain short- and long- term risks. The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) was developed in order to avoid these risks and complications. However, this system is associated with its own set of limitations and complications. First, patient selection is important, as S-ICDs do not provide pacing therapy currently. Second, pre-procedural screening is important to minimise T wave and myopotential oversensing. Finally, until recently, the S-ICD was primarily used in younger patients with fewer co-morbidities and less structural heart disease, limiting the general applicability of the device. S-ICDs achieve excellent rates of arrhythmia conversion and have demonstrated noninferiority to TV-ICDs in terms of complication rates in real-world studies. The objective of this review is to discuss the latest literature, including the UNTOUCHED and PRAETORIAN trials, and to address the risk of inappropriate shocks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karimianpour, A., John, L., & Gold, M. R. (2021, July 1). The subcutaneous ICD: A review of the UNTOUCHED and PRAETORIAN trials. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review. Radcliffe Medical Media. https://doi.org/10.15420/aer.2020.47

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free