Ethical dilemmas when conducting sensitive research: interviewing offenders convicted of child pornography

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This article aims to describe the personal experience and ethical dilemmas that the author encountered when conducting qualitative research on a highly sensitive topic, i.e. interviews with offenders convicted of child pornography. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses an autoethnographic approach to describe and reflect on my personal experience, emotions and ethical dilemmas when undertaking sensitive research that examines illegal acts. Findings: Ethical dilemmas and emotional challenges highlighted refer to the issue of access to useful empirical material, conducting interviews with convicted offenders in prison environments, the complexity surrounding confidentiality when interviewing offenders about their criminal activities, vulnerability and insecurity for the researcher and emotional challenges for the researcher when listening to the offenders’ stories describing serious crimes against children. Originality/value: This article contributes with insights and reflections on conducting qualitative research with a marginalized and stigmatized group in prison environments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eneman, M. (2022). Ethical dilemmas when conducting sensitive research: interviewing offenders convicted of child pornography. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 20(3), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-03-2022-0028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free