Encounters with the centaur state: Advanced urban marginality and the practices and ethics of welfare sanctions regimes

37Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article examines the relationships between advanced urban marginality and new forms of state craft to regulate marginalised populations, specifically Wacquant’s concept of the centaur state and the use of conditionality mechanisms in the British welfare state. The article empirically explores the experiences and perspectives of welfare practitioners and subjects. It finds some evidence of an inculcation of elite narratives and understandings of urban marginality and incidences of antagonism. However, the orientations and ethical frameworks of those deploying or subject to processes of sanctioning within reconfigured welfare regimes are more differentiated and ambiguous than both governmental discourse and critical urban studies often suggest.

References Powered by Scopus

Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare, and Social Insecurity1

625Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Territorial stigmatization in action

419Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Housing market renewal and social class

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Intensity, moderation, and the pressures of expectation: Calculation and coercion in the street-level practice of welfare conditionality

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of housing policy in perpetuating conditional forms of homelessness support in the era of housing first: Evidence from Australia

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Producing the vulnerable subject in English drug policy

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flint, J. (2019). Encounters with the centaur state: Advanced urban marginality and the practices and ethics of welfare sanctions regimes. Urban Studies, 56(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017750070

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

72%

Researcher 7

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 22

79%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

7%

Arts and Humanities 2

7%

Psychology 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0