The impact of monetary policy shocks on the equity risk premium before and after the quantitative easing in the United Kingdom

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The authors investigate the impact of structural monetary policy shocks on ex-post equity risk premium (ERP) of aggregate and sectoral FTSE indices and 25 Fama-French style value-weighted portfolios. They find that monetary policy shocks negatively affect the ERP but at the sectoral level, the magnitude of the response is heterogeneous. Further, monetary policy shocks have a significant negative (positive) impact on the ERP before (after) the implementation of quantitative easing (QE). The empirical evidence provided in the paper sheds light on the equity market's asymmetric response to the BoE's policy before and after the monetary stimulus.

References Powered by Scopus

Discretion versus policy rules in practice

4051Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns

3470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investor sentiment in the stock market

2149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A structural break approach to analysing the impact of the QE portfolio balance channel on the US stock market

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Equity Convexity under Major Monetary Policy Shift

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poshakwale, S., & Chandorkar, P. (2016). The impact of monetary policy shocks on the equity risk premium before and after the quantitative easing in the United Kingdom. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 13(4), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(4-1).2016.01

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

40%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

43%

Engineering 2

29%

Computer Science 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0