Background: The purpose of this study was to compare docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine combinations as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients and Methods: Previously untreated patients with ABC were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel 75 mg/m2 plus epirubicin 75 mg/m2 (DE) on day 1 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus capecitabine 950 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 (DC) in 21-day cycles. Previous anthracycline-based (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed >1 year before enrollment. The primary objective of the study was to compare time to disease progression (TTP). Results: One hundred and thirty-six women were treated on each arm and median TTP was 10.6 versus 11.0 months (P = 0.7), for DE and DC, respectively. According to RECIST criteria we observed 15 (11%) versus 11 (8%) complete responses and 55 (40%) versus 61 (45%) partial responses (P = 0.8), with DE and DC, respectively. Severe toxicity included grade 3-4 neutropenia (57% versus 46%; P = 0.07), febrile neutropenia (11% versus 8%; P = 0.4), hand-foot syndrome (0% versus 4%; P = 0.02), grade 2-3 anemia (20% versus 7%; P = 0.001) and asthenia (12% versus 6%; P = 0.09) with DE and DC, respectively. Conclusions: The DE and DC regimens have similar efficacy but different toxicity. Either regimen can be used as front-line treatment of ABC. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
CITATION STYLE
Mavroudis, D., Papakotoulas, P., Ardavanis, A., Syrigos, K., Kakolyris, S., Ziras, N., … Georgoulias, V. (2009). Randomized phase III trial comparing docetaxel plus epirubicin versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer. Annals of Oncology, 21(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp498
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.