Comparison of Microleakage and Compressive Strength of Different Base Materials

  • Jang E
  • Lee J
  • Nam S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study compared the microleakages and compressive strengths of various base materials. To evaluate microleakages, 50 extracted permanent premolars were prepared. The teeth divided into 5 groups of 10 each according to the base materials. Cavities with a 5.0 mm width, 3.0 mm length, and 3.0 mm depth were formed on the buccal surfaces of the teeth. After filling the cavities with different base materials, a composite resin was used for final restoration. Each specimen was immersed in 2% methylene blue solution and then observed under a stereoscopic microscope (× 30). To evaluate the compressive strength, 5 cylindrical specimens were prepared for each base material. A universal testing machine was used to measure the compressive strength. The microleakage was highest in the Riva light cure TM group and lowest in the Biodentine TM and Well-Root TM PT groups. For the compressive strengths, in all groups, acceptable strength values for base materials were found. The highest compressive strength was observed in the Fuji II LC TM group and the lowest strength in the Well-Root TM PT group.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jang, E., Lee, J., Nam, S., Kwon, T., & Kim, H. (2021). Comparison of Microleakage and Compressive Strength of Different Base Materials. THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY, 48(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2021.48.2.168

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

92%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

93%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free