Ultrasound Guidance versus the Landmark Technique for the Placement of Central Venous Catheters in the Emergency Department

  • Miller A
  • Roth B
  • Mills T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To compare ultrasound (US)-guided vs. landmark guided techniques for central venous access (CVA) in the emergency department. Methods: This was a prospective study of consecutive patients enrolled at a university teaching hospital with an annual census of approximately 100,000. On even days patients had CVA with ultrasonic assistance; patients presenting on odd days had CVA via traditional landmark techniques. Ul-trasound users were emergency medicine faculty or residents who completed a one-hour training session. A data collection tool with 17 variables was completed for each central line placed. Variables were compared using the independent t-test, Fisher's exact test, and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Between August 1, 2000, and February 1, 2001, data for 122 subjects (n = 51 for US, and n = 71 for landmark) were collected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, A. H., Roth, B. A., Mills, T. J., Woody, J. R., Longmoor, C. E., & Foster, B. (2002). Ultrasound Guidance versus the Landmark Technique for the Placement of Central Venous Catheters in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9(8), 800–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02168.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free