Objective: To compare ultrasound (US)-guided vs. landmark guided techniques for central venous access (CVA) in the emergency department. Methods: This was a prospective study of consecutive patients enrolled at a university teaching hospital with an annual census of approximately 100,000. On even days patients had CVA with ultrasonic assistance; patients presenting on odd days had CVA via traditional landmark techniques. Ul-trasound users were emergency medicine faculty or residents who completed a one-hour training session. A data collection tool with 17 variables was completed for each central line placed. Variables were compared using the independent t-test, Fisher's exact test, and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Between August 1, 2000, and February 1, 2001, data for 122 subjects (n = 51 for US, and n = 71 for landmark) were collected.
CITATION STYLE
Miller, A. H., Roth, B. A., Mills, T. J., Woody, J. R., Longmoor, C. E., & Foster, B. (2002). Ultrasound Guidance versus the Landmark Technique for the Placement of Central Venous Catheters in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9(8), 800–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02168.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.