Option-implied betas and the cross section of stock returns

5Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigate the cross-sectional relationship between stock returns and a number of measures of option-implied beta. Using portfolio analysis, we show that the method proposed by Buss and Vilkov (2012, The Review of Financial Studies, 2525, 3113–3140) leads to a stronger relationship between implied beta and stock returns than other approaches. However, using the Fama and MacBeth (1973, Journal of Political Economy, 8181, 607–636) cross-section regression methodology, we show that the relationship is not robust to the inclusion of other firm characteristics. We further show that a similar result holds for implied downside beta. We, therefore, conclude that there is no robust relation between option-implied beta and returns.

References Powered by Scopus

Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds

13688Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK

9706Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns

8587Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Risk premium spillovers among stock markets: Evidence from higher-order moments

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exchange options under clustered jump dynamics

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating Forward-Looking Stock Correlations from Risk Factors

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harris, R. D. F., Li, X., & Qiao, F. (2019). Option-implied betas and the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Futures Markets, 39(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.21936

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

80%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

45%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

27%

Mathematics 2

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free