Background: Many glaucoma referrals from the community to hospital eye services are unnecessary. Imaging technologies can potentially be useful to triage this population. Objectives: To assess the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of imaging technologies as triage tests for identifying people with glaucoma. Design: Within-patient comparative diagnostic accuracy study. Markov economic model comparing the cost-effectiveness of a triage test with usual care. Setting: Secondary care. Participants: Adults referred from the community to hospital eye services for possible glaucoma. Interventions: Heidelberg Retinal Tomography (HRT), including two diagnostic algorithms, glaucoma probability score (HRT-GPS) and Moorfields regression analysis (HRT-MRA); scanning laser polarimetry [glaucoma diagnostics (GDx)]; and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The reference standard was clinical examination by a consultant ophthalmologist with glaucoma expertise including visual field testing and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.
CITATION STYLE
Azuara-Blanco, A., Banister, K., Boachie, C., McMeekin, P., Gray, J., Burr, J., … Cook, J. (2016). Automated imaging technologies for the diagnosis of glaucoma: A comparative diagnostic study for the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy, performance as triage tests and cost-effectiveness (GATE study). Health Technology Assessment, 20(8), 1–168. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20080
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.