Automated imaging technologies for the diagnosis of glaucoma: A comparative diagnostic study for the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy, performance as triage tests and cost-effectiveness (GATE study)

35Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Many glaucoma referrals from the community to hospital eye services are unnecessary. Imaging technologies can potentially be useful to triage this population. Objectives: To assess the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of imaging technologies as triage tests for identifying people with glaucoma. Design: Within-patient comparative diagnostic accuracy study. Markov economic model comparing the cost-effectiveness of a triage test with usual care. Setting: Secondary care. Participants: Adults referred from the community to hospital eye services for possible glaucoma. Interventions: Heidelberg Retinal Tomography (HRT), including two diagnostic algorithms, glaucoma probability score (HRT-GPS) and Moorfields regression analysis (HRT-MRA); scanning laser polarimetry [glaucoma diagnostics (GDx)]; and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The reference standard was clinical examination by a consultant ophthalmologist with glaucoma expertise including visual field testing and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azuara-Blanco, A., Banister, K., Boachie, C., McMeekin, P., Gray, J., Burr, J., … Cook, J. (2016). Automated imaging technologies for the diagnosis of glaucoma: A comparative diagnostic study for the evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy, performance as triage tests and cost-effectiveness (GATE study). Health Technology Assessment, 20(8), 1–168. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta20080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free