Does grazing of cover crops impact biologically active soil carbon and nitrogen fractions under inversion or no tillage management?

40Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cover crops are a key component of conservation cropping systems. They can also be a key component of integrated crop-livestock systems by offering high-quality forage during short periods between cash crops. The impact of cattle grazing on biologically active soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) fractions has not received much attention. We investigated the impacts of tillage (conventional disk and no tillage) and cover crop management (ungrazed and grazed) on biologically active soil C and N fractions from biennial sampling during seven years of continuous management. Soil microbial biomass C was unaffected by cover crop management under conventional tillage, but was enhanced with grazing compared with no grazing under no tillage at a depth of 0 to 6 cm (0 to 2.4 in), as well as at 0 to 30 cm (0 to 12 in). The same effect occurred for the flush of carbon dioxide (CO2) following rewetting of dried soil during 3 days of incubation at a depth of 0 to 6 cm only, while it occurred for cumulative C mineralization during 24 days of incubation at a depth of 0 to 30 cm only. Grazing effects on net N mineralization during 24 days of incubation and residual soil inorganic N were nonexistent. All biologically active fractions of soil C and N were highly stratified with depth under no tillage and less so under conventional tillage. Cumulative stocks of soil C and N fractions to a depth of 0 to 30 cm were generally not significantly different between cover crop management systems, nor between tillage systems, except for (1) lower soil microbial biomass C with than without grazing under conventional tillage, (2) greater soil microbial biomass C with than without grazing under no tillage, and (3) lower cumulative C mineralization during 24 days under no tillage than under conventional tillage. Grazing of cover crops can be recommended as a strategy to promote greater adoption of cover cropping throughout the southeastern United States.

References Powered by Scopus

Soil quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation: (A guest editorial)

1466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rhizosphere: Biophysics, biogeochemistry and ecological relevance

951Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Soil organic matter stratification ratio as an indicator of soil quality

765Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Identifying the main crops and key factors determining the carbon footprint of crop production in China, 2001–2018

146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Should Soil Testing Services Measure Soil Biological Activity?

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The potential of multi-species mixtures to diversify cover crop benefits

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franzluebbers, A. J., & Stuedemann, J. A. (2015). Does grazing of cover crops impact biologically active soil carbon and nitrogen fractions under inversion or no tillage management? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 70(6), 365–373. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.70.6.365

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

72%

Researcher 13

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52

83%

Environmental Science 9

14%

Chemical Engineering 1

2%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free