Sustainability pedagogy: Understanding, exploring and internalizing nature’s complexity and coherence

4Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic has affected student academic performance as well as mental, physical, and social wellbeing. During a lockdown at the University of Toronto in Canada (September 2020–April 2021), my students expressed an underlying sense of monotony yet uncertainty. I recalled a contrasting paradox from the teachings of Indigenous Cree on mental wellness in land-based experiences: a sense of stimulation and security that we can liken to variations of Appleton’s prospect-refuge theory. I modified my Environmental Science and Pathways to Sustainability course to support stimulation and security through embodied, interactive pedagogy at student-selected individual field sites. My main goals were to (i) support student mental wellness and (ii) provide an alternative to experiential field trips for understanding and connecting with nature as an adaptive complex system. I prompted students with field activities contextualized by a course narrative that purposefully directed attention to nature through intrinsically motivated curiosity, exploration, and discovery; conditions more similar to evolutionary environments of adaptedness than “getting away” in passive retreats. Student weekly field observations and reflections culminated in a post-intervention Reflection Assignment (n = 15) which became the bases of thematic and narrative analysis. Other assignments were added to my evaluation of complexity comprehension. The intervention successfully instilled security and stimulation via purpose-directed attention to different aspects of nature in the same setting followed by periods of knowledge integration. This empowered students with sustainability mindsets indicated by greater self-reported: sense of coherence, change agency, cognitive and affective restoration, nature connectedness, nature relatedness, social connectedness, and pro-environmental values. Assignments demonstrated an understanding of the environment as an adaptive complex system that was not present at the beginning of the course. Some students’ self-construct adopted nature and its complexity, empowering them with greater trait resilience. This work speaks to opportunities for merging psychological restoration and analytical curricula by integrating cognitive and sensory meaningfulness in sustainability narratives. It asks scholars to reflect on how we operationalize foundational theories of Environmental Psychology based on ancestral survival conditions and encourages empirical research to consider how sociocultural contexts can direct attention to nature through purposeful inquiry.

References Powered by Scopus

The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework

4513Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments

3787Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework

1725Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Benefits of Adopting Wild Pedagogies in University Education

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Indicator assessment of groundwater resource sustainability: Using the framework of socio-ecological systems in Hamedan - Bahar Plain, Iran

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The relationship of anxiety, benefit finding and academic engagement among Chinese college students in different stages of COVID-19: a repeated cross-sectional pilot study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spiegelaar, N. (2023). Sustainability pedagogy: Understanding, exploring and internalizing nature’s complexity and coherence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922275

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

32%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

21%

Researcher 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

38%

Social Sciences 5

31%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

19%

Chemistry 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free