The Scale Development for Experiential Value Scale for Sport Consumption (EVSSC) and Fan Segmentation in J-League Team

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of interpretation of gait analysis data between physicians and institutions. Gait analysis data from seven patients were reviewed by 12 experienced gait laboratory physicians from six institutions. Reviewers identified problems and made treatment recommendations based on the data provided. Agreement among physicians for the most commonly diagnosed problems was slight to moderate (kappa range, 0.14-0.46). Physicians agreed on identification of soft tissue more than bony problems (intraclass correlation, 0.56 vs. 0.37). Variability regarding surgical recommendations for soft-tissue procedures (kappa range, 0.20-0.64) was similar to that for diagnosis of both soft-tissue and bone problems, although recommendation for hamstring lengthening showed substantial agreement (kappa = 0.64). There was less agreement in recommendation of osteotomies (kappa range, 0.13-0.22). Physicians agreed more on the number of soft-tissue procedures than bone procedures recommended (intraclass correlation, 0.65 vs. 0.19). There was an interinstitutional difference in the frequency of soft-tissue (p = 0.0152) and osseous problem identification (p = 0.0002), as well as in the frequency of recommendations for soft-tissue surgery (p = 0.0004) and osteotomies (p < 0.0001). Although gait analysis data are themselves objective, this study demonstrates some subjectivity in their interpretation. The interobserver variability reported here is similar to that reported for established classification systems of various orthopedic conditions.