Fungal keratitis, or misled by a small insect?

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The pine processionary caterpillar is an insect that has multiple small, thin hairs around its body as a defense mechanism. These hairs have a hazardous effect on ocular structures and cause a broad range of reactions from conjunctivitis to endophthalmitis, referred to as ophthalmia nodosa. The diagnosis of the disease is based on the patient’s history and the detection of the hairs on ocular structures. In this report, we present a patient with ophthalmia nodosa misdiagnosed as fungal keratitis, and the actual diagnosis was made by in vivo confocal microscopy. We also would like to increase awareness among ophthalmologists about the disease which has a growing distribution area due to climate change.

References Powered by Scopus

Processionary Moths and Associated Urtication Risk: Global ChangeDriven Effects

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intraocular caterpillar hairs (SETAE): Clinical course and management

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Caterpillar-induced keratitis

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The use of in vivo confocal microscopy in fungal keratitis – Progress and challenges

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A novel mutation in the PRPH2 gene in a Chinese pedigree with retinitis pigmentosa and angle-closure glaucoma

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Case report: Scleromalacia caused by rheumatoid arthritis combined with high intraocular pressure, first discovered due to ocular trauma

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bayraktutar, B. N., Taş, A. Y., & Şahin, A. (2020). Fungal keratitis, or misled by a small insect? Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, 50(2), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.07573

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

60%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

20%

Researcher 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

38%

Social Sciences 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0