Effect of Implementing Simulation Education on Health Care Worker Comfort With Nasopharyngeal Swabbing for COVID-19

25Citations
Citations of this article
169Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if rapid implementation of simulation training for the nasopharyngeal swab procedure can increase provider confidence regarding procedure competency. Methods: A simulation training exercise was designed as a departmental initiative to improve competency performing nasopharyngeal swabs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sixty-one health care workers attended teaching sessions led by the Department of Otorhinolaryngology on proper nasopharyngeal swab technique. After a brief lecture, participants practiced their swab technique using a high-fidelity airway simulation model. Pre- and postintervention self-evaluations were measured via standardized clinical competency questionnaires on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “No knowledge, unable to perform” up to “Highly knowledgeable and confident, independent.” Results: Forty-six participants in this study submitted pre- and postintervention self-assessments. Postintervention scores improved on average 1.41 points (95% CI, 1.10-1.73) out of 5 from a mean score of 3.13 to 4.54 (P

References Powered by Scopus

7165Citations
11455Readers
Get full text

Your institution provides access to this article.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mark, M. E., LoSavio, P., Husain, I., Papagiannopoulos, P., Batra, P. S., & Tajudeen, B. A. (2020). Effect of Implementing Simulation Education on Health Care Worker Comfort With Nasopharyngeal Swabbing for COVID-19. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), 163(2), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820933168

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 53

62%

Researcher 17

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 43

54%

Nursing and Health Professions 22

28%

Social Sciences 8

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free