Sexually Abusive Youth with Low Intellectual Functioning: Contemporary Risk Assessment Findings from MEGA ♪ Studies

3Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Presented are the largest studies in the field of risk assessment of sexually abusive youths, of youth with low intellectual functioning of borderline or below average (n = 746 and n = 522). Youth were part of two major validation studies [1979–2017]: MEGA ♪ Combined Samples Studies (N = 3,901 and MEGA ♪ Combined Cross Validation Studies (N = 2,717). Samples were adjudicated and non-adjudicated (males, females, and transgender-female (Trans-MTF) sexually abusive youth, ages 4–19). The measure employed was the ecologically framed MEGA ♪ risk level assessment tool, with statistically weighted cutoff scores (i.e. normative data, calibrated risk levels grounded on given algorithms) according to age and gender. Presented are findings on descriptive characteristics and risk levels of youth in both samples who have low intellectual functioning of borderline or below average. Risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth need to show sensitivity to developmental issues, gender, and intellectual functioning, with calibrated risk levels according to age and gender.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2020). Sexually Abusive Youth with Low Intellectual Functioning: Contemporary Risk Assessment Findings from MEGA ♪ Studies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 29(8), 1000–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2019.1660444

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free