Objective: Restrictions imposed for the COVID-19 pandemic and the people's fear of getting infected have caused a significant drop in the number of emergency service admissions. Herein, we aimed to investigate the reflections of our otherwise crowded emergency services’ quietness in the period of normalisation. Methodology: Our study retrospectively investigated three groups of patients: the patients who were admitted to the emergency service in the ‘Period of Restrictions’ when the restrictions were imposed to limit the spread of the COVID-19 infection; the patients who were admitted to the emergency service in the ‘Period of Normalisation’ when normalisation attempts were made and the restrictions were lifted; and the patients who were admitted to the emergency service in the ‘Period of Pre-pandemic Normal’ exactly 1 year before the normalisation period, which would reflect the normal functioning of the emergency service at that time. The three groups were compared with respect to the demographic characteristics and patient outcomes (death/hospitalisation/discharge). Results: A total of 69 474 patients were admitted to the emergency service in the ‘Period of Pre-pandemic Normal’ whereas 21 278 patients were admitted in the ‘Period of Restrictions’. The number of emergency service admissions in the ‘Period of Restrictions’ was significantly lower (P
CITATION STYLE
Görmeli Kurt, N., & Çamcı, M. (2021). COVID-19: How do emergency departments fare after normalisation steps? International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13912
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.